20080821

I blame the printing press.

You heard me. The printing press. Why else would we be literally inundated with such bad writing daily? There wouldn't be a market for fifteen John Grisham books. You know, Shakespeare isn't really a classic because he's such a fabulous writer. He's a classic because he wrote in a difficult style, and he wrote a lot. Given that bookmaking was a pretty laborious process at that point in history, the fact that his words remain today says a lot about their popularity. Everyone who could read would have had a copy, like people today...read the comics. Or Stephen King. Get it? Shakespeare wrote as a populist writer, just like Dickens did when he began the concept of serialization. So people who couldn't write more than one book, really, or if they were really on a roll two or three suddenly became GREAT CLASSICAL WRITERS because they got some chapters in print once upon a time in history and got lucky.

Obviously, I do not find much merit in the works of Dickens (but I am quite fond of Shakespeare, in my limited exposure...I can appreciate the complexity of writing reams upon reams of freaking rhyming narrative dialog. Plus, he does some awesome evil villians. Even if his historical depiction is factually incorrect ala Richard III).

I remember reading The Count of Monte Cristo as a child (I think I can be forgiven for mistaking the flamboyance of the French with brilliance) and thinking I'd made a brilliant discovery!! Such an inspired writer. Oooh laaa laaa. And then I read The Three Musketeers and Twenty Years After, and realized that they were...disappointing formula! Drivel! Standard and repeatable! Downtrodden, I took four valium, put on my second best Burberry coat, fully stone laden, and swanned off down to the Thames to do my best Chav tastic dive.

That kind of standard and repeatable. The one that makes you go; ok, the second Bridget Jones was actually...not good. At one stage, you enjoy it like comfort food. As a teenager, Barbara Cartland's were like grilled cheese and tomato soup.

So I blame the printing press. Without it, and certainly without this lovely tool that allows me to abuse it daily (dear, sweet internet), writers that we all would certainly otherwise would consider to be brilliant and inspired will continue to write lost past their creative expiration dates.

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

I read what you say about Charles Dickens. Sigh.....

Anonymous said...

Ahhhh... The French... Wine, Cheese, Fashion, Arrogance, and Body Odor... Not much more than that today.. They would be speaking German if not for us. There was a day when they could take care of themselves now LONG gone and replaced with a cowardly weakness... Yet we continue to give them millions of dollars every year for nothing and never expect a return.

Shakespeare was famous because he is Shakespeare. His writing was him and by his standards not difficult I would think but rather defines his own trademark style without effort of definition, because to him it was an unforeseen definition. Few timeless artists are ever seen as such in their own times.

I onced mentioned Ansel Adams to someone and heard "oh, he is soooo out of style".. I replied "Hm, I do not look at artists as trendy ma'am, I like them because they are talented, not because of what happens to be popular at the moment." Like I give a fuck if if YOU approve, you superficial sheep. The man had an eye and a love for natural beauty. It as the forementioned writers recognizeably defined him also..

I myself am not a big "reader"; if there is a movie I am ashamed to admit that I would watch it before I would ever read it. Too much to do in life and work for me to spend that time.

BUT......

Shakespeare can be as easily recognizable as Hitchcock and a few talented others because they are defined by their uniqueness, entailed of their own inner visions (style).

Dickens, nothing to sneeze at…. but sometimes good to yawn at : ).. at any rate, no individual writing or reading in this blog will, more than likely, ever match his popularity and respect in his field. throw mud as you may my love :-x

Anonymous said...

To m.e. If not for the French, you would be speaking English.

Eliza Doolittle said...

Anonymous,

Uh, this is considered English, I have to press "1" to hear it everytime I call a support line.

I am well aware of the history of this country.

"There was a day when they could take care of themselves now LONG gone and replaced with a cowardly weakness..."
We have remained resilient and strong, the same cannot be said for the French.
Nice try, Go suck on a lime :)

Eliza Doolittle said...

The above post was ghost written by Mr. Manners.....